Latest Articles

I’m standing in the kitchen waiting for Pandora to finish making breakfast when I notice something unusual about her tea. She has poured the hot water, added the tea bag, and stirred it exactly three times, but she has not reached for the sugar container. This is significant because Pandora has been putting two spoonfuls of sugar in her morning tea for as long as I can remember. I know this because I have watched her make tea hundreds of times, usually while she is telling me something I am apparently not listening to closely enough. This morning, however, she is drinking it without sugar, and I cannot help wondering whether the change is intentional. John Mercer is sitting at the kitchen table eating cereal, and when I glance toward him, I catch him looking at me with an expression that suggests he knows something I don’t. Mr Whiskers is sitting beside Pandora’s chair, watching her with the patient confidence of an animal who has learned that persistence sometimes results in food. Everything appears perfectly normal, which is precisely what makes the missing sugar so difficult to ignore.

I ask Pandora whether she forgot the sugar. She looks at her cup, then at me, and says, “No.” I wait for an explanation, but none arrives. I ask whether she is trying something different. She says, “I suppose you could say that.” This is not especially reassuring. People do not ordinarily abandon a long-established breakfast habit without some reason, and Pandora has never struck me as someone who makes arbitrary changes to her morning routine. I ask whether she is feeling all right. She says she feels fine. I ask whether the tea tastes different. She says it does. I ask whether she prefers it that way. She gives me a look that suggests I am approaching the limits of her patience. “Hal, can we talk about something?” she asks. I tell her of course we can, but first I would like to understand why she stopped using sugar. John lowers his cereal spoon and stares at me. Pandora takes another sip of tea and says, “Never mind. We’ll talk later.” I make a mental note that the change in her tea consumption has now coincided with an unexplained desire to discuss something privately.

John follows me into the living room a few minutes later and asks whether I noticed anything unusual about Pandora this morning. I tell him I noticed the sugar. He closes his eyes briefly, which I interpret as confirmation that he has noticed something too. “That’s not what I meant,” he says. I ask what he did mean. He tells me Pandora has been trying to talk to me about something since yesterday evening. I ask whether he knows what it is. He says he does, but that I should probably hear it from her. This is an interesting development because it establishes that John possesses information I do not, and he is unwilling to disclose it. I ask whether the matter concerns household expenses, given our recent discussion about subscriptions and takeout spending. John says no. I ask whether it concerns Mrs Jenkins and the gardening gloves. Again, no. I ask whether Mr Whiskers is involved. John looks toward the cat, who is now washing his face on the couch, and says, “Not everything involves the cat.” I remind him that the cat has been involved in a surprising number of recent household incidents. John says, “Hal, just listen to Pandora when she talks to you.” I tell him I always listen to Pandora. He gives me a look that is almost identical to the one Pandora gave me in the kitchen.

At work, I mention the situation to Karen because I want an independent opinion on whether a sudden change in a person’s morning routine can indicate that something else is bothering them. Karen asks what changed. I explain that Pandora stopped putting sugar in her tea and then asked to talk to me about something. Karen looks at me for a moment before asking whether I let her talk. I explain that I was attempting to clarify the circumstances surrounding the missing sugar. Dave, who has been listening from his desk, asks whether I have considered the possibility that Pandora simply wants to consume less sugar. I tell him that is certainly possible, but it does not explain John’s unusual behavior. Karen asks what John did. I explain that he told me to listen to Pandora. She nods slowly and says, “That sounds like good advice.” I point out that John also admitted he knew something I didn’t. Dave says, “Maybe he knows you’re not listening.” I tell him that conclusion is unsupported by the available evidence. Karen asks whether Pandora actually told me what she wanted to discuss. I admit she tried, but the conversation became sidetracked. Dave asks what sidetracked it. I don’t answer immediately because I suspect the response will not improve my position.

When I get home that afternoon, Mrs Jenkins is standing outside her door talking to Pandora. They stop speaking when I approach, which ordinarily would not bother me, except Mrs Jenkins immediately smiles and says, “Oh, there he is.” I ask whether they were discussing me. Pandora says they were discussing the noise from our house last night. Apparently John had been playing his guitar later than usual, and Mrs Jenkins could hear it through the wall. She wasn’t angry, but she had mentioned it to Pandora that morning. I apologize and tell her I’ll remind John to keep the volume down after a reasonable hour. Mrs Jenkins thanks me and says, “Pandora was just telling me she has something she wants to ask you.” I look at Pandora. She looks at Mrs Jenkins. Mrs Jenkins smiles again, apparently unaware that she has just introduced another unexplained detail into an already complicated situation. I ask Pandora what she wants to ask me. She says, “Can we go inside first?” I agree, although I would have preferred to resolve the matter while an independent witness was still available.

Once we’re inside, Pandora puts her bag on the table and asks me to sit down. I do, but I cannot help noticing that John has appeared in the hallway and is watching us with considerable interest. I ask whether this is a household meeting. Pandora says no. I ask whether John needs to be present. She says he doesn’t. John immediately says, “I’m just getting water,” although he has not moved toward the kitchen. Mr Whiskers walks into the room and jumps onto the couch beside me, which gives the entire situation the uncomfortable appearance of a formal proceeding. Pandora sits across from me and says, “Hal, I have been trying to tell you something since yesterday.” I tell her I know. She looks surprised. I explain that I noticed the change in her tea, John’s unusual behavior, and Mrs Jenkins’ comment about her wanting to ask me something. Pandora stares at me for several seconds before asking whether I have been investigating her breakfast. I tell her I prefer to think of it as recognizing a deviation from an established pattern. She rubs her forehead and says, “This is exactly what I wanted to talk to you about.”

I lean forward because this is the first direct confirmation that my observations have identified something meaningful. Pandora explains that she has been feeling as though we spend more time discussing the details of everyday life than actually enjoying it. Over the past few weeks, a crooked coffee-canister lid became an investigation, a pair of forgotten gardening gloves occupied an entire morning, and Mr Whiskers’ interest in salmon treats led to a detailed discussion about feline memory. She says she finds some of it funny, but lately she has been trying to tell me ordinary things and getting interrupted by questions about completely unrelated details. Yesterday evening she tried to ask whether we could spend Saturday together without making plans around chores or errands, but I became distracted when Mr Whiskers started scratching at the cupboard. This morning she tried again, but I became preoccupied with the sugar. I listen carefully because, for once, I am beginning to suspect that the relevant information has been available to me all along and I have been examining the wrong evidence.

I ask whether she is upset with me. Pandora shakes her head and says she isn’t angry; she just wants us to have a little more time together without every small detail becoming a mystery. She explains that she stopped putting sugar in her tea because she has been trying to cut back on it, something she apparently mentioned during dinner two nights ago. I remember the conversation vaguely. At the time, however, I was explaining to John why Mr Whiskers’ ability to remember where his treats were hidden represented an interesting example of associative learning. Pandora says, “You nodded when I told you.” I tell her I probably did. She says, “You even said, ‘That makes sense.’” I consider this carefully. It appears I acknowledged information without actually processing it, which is a troubling failure of attention. I apologize and tell her she has a fair point. Pandora smiles and says she appreciates that. Then she asks whether we can spend Saturday together, just the two of us, without turning the day into another investigation. I tell her that sounds wonderful. She looks relieved.

John chooses that moment to walk into the living room carrying the glass of water he apparently spent fifteen minutes obtaining. He asks whether everything is okay. Pandora says it is. I tell him we have resolved a communication issue. John looks at Pandora, who gives him a small nod, and then looks at me. “So you finally listened?” he asks. I tell him I have always listened, but I am willing to acknowledge that my recent attention to minor environmental details may occasionally have interfered with my ability to recognize more important information. John takes a drink of water and says, “That’s the longest way I’ve ever heard anyone say yes.” Pandora laughs, and even I have to admit that his summary is reasonably accurate. Mr Whiskers, who has been sitting quietly beside me throughout the conversation, stretches, jumps down from the couch, and walks toward the kitchen. I watch him go but deliberately resist the urge to follow. Pandora notices and smiles. “See? Progress.” I tell her I am capable of ignoring the cat when circumstances require it.

We spend the rest of the evening making plans for Saturday. Pandora suggests breakfast somewhere nice, followed by a walk and perhaps a little shopping if we feel like it. I agree without asking why she chose those particular activities or whether there is some underlying significance to the order in which she mentioned them. She seems pleased by this, and I have to admit the conversation is considerably more relaxing when I am not attempting to identify hidden motives behind every suggestion. John passes through the room on his way upstairs and asks whether we want him to keep an eye on Mr Whiskers while we’re out. Pandora thanks him and says that would be helpful. I briefly consider asking whether John has noticed any changes in the cat’s behavior, but decide against it. There are moments when the preservation of domestic harmony is more important than the pursuit of additional information. I am learning this, although I suspect the process will require practice.

Later that night, Pandora makes herself another cup of tea while I finish some work at the kitchen table. I notice that she doesn’t add sugar, but this time I don’t mention it. She looks at me, clearly waiting to see whether I will say something. I smile and return to my laptop. Pandora comes over, kisses me on the cheek, and says, “Thank you.” I tell her she’s welcome. For several minutes everything is peaceful. John is upstairs, Mrs Jenkins is presumably enjoying an evening free from guitar music, and Mr Whiskers is sleeping on the couch. I begin to think that perhaps Pandora is right and I should spend less time interpreting ordinary household behavior as evidence of something extraordinary. Then I notice that Pandora has left her tea bag on the counter instead of throwing it away. Under normal circumstances I would consider this an insignificant detail, but given our recent conversation, I recognize that mentioning it would be unwise. I say nothing. Pandora finishes her tea and goes upstairs.

A few minutes later, Mr Whiskers wanders into the kitchen, jumps onto the counter, and begins sniffing the discarded tea bag. I look at him. He looks at me. I tell him quietly that we are not doing this tonight. He sniffs the tea bag again, paws at it, and knocks it onto the floor. I get up, pick it up, and throw it away. Mr Whiskers watches me, then walks over to the cupboard where his treats are stored. He sits down and meows. I tell him he has already eaten. He meows again. I glance toward the stairs, where Pandora has disappeared, and consider the situation. I have promised to stop turning every small household occurrence into an investigation, and I intend to honor that promise. Nevertheless, I can’t help noticing that Mr Whiskers has waited until Pandora is out of the room before making his request. I look down at him and say, “I know what you’re doing.” He blinks slowly and meows again. I decide not to investigate. I give him one treat, return to my laptop, and congratulate myself on demonstrating considerable personal growth. It isn’t until several minutes later that I realize the cat has successfully obtained exactly what he wanted without requiring me to ask a single question.

Related Posts

• I Think Pandora Came Home Early Yesterday
• I Think John Mercer Borrowed Pandora’s Stuff Without Asking
• I Think John Mercer Said Something to Upset Her

I’m standing in the kitchen making my morning coffee when I notice Mrs Jenkins’ gardening gloves sitting on the counter. This is unusual for several reasons, beginning with the fact that Mrs Jenkins does not live here and generally takes her gardening equipment home when she finishes using it. The gloves are green, slightly muddy, and positioned beside the sink as though someone deliberately placed them there rather than accidentally dropping them. Pandora is still asleep, John Mercer has just wandered into the kitchen looking like a man who spent the night negotiating with his pillow and lost, and Mr Whiskers is sitting near the back door staring at something I cannot see. I have a French press full of freshly brewed coffee in front of me, but I haven’t poured a cup yet because the gloves have introduced a question that requires clarification. I ask John whether he knows why Mrs Jenkins’ gardening gloves are on our counter. He looks at them, looks at me, and says, “Because she left them here?” I tell him that is an observation, not an explanation. He opens the refrigerator and says, “Then I have nothing.”

John has been unusually tired all week, which is another detail I have been meaning to investigate. He has been staying up late working on something in his room, and whenever I ask what he is doing, he gives me answers like “stuff” or “trying to finish something.” I don’t consider either response particularly informative. This morning he looks especially exhausted, and when I mention it, he tells me he was awake until almost two. I ask whether that has anything to do with Mrs Jenkins’ gloves. He stops pouring milk into his cereal and stares at me. “Why would it?” I explain that I am trying to establish whether there is a connection between his recent late nights and the unexplained presence of gardening equipment in our kitchen. John considers this for a moment before saying, “Hal, I was working on my computer. I wasn’t gardening.” I point out that people can participate in activities without personally performing every component. He tells me he is going back to bed. Unfortunately, this means the first potential witness has withdrawn before I can establish a complete timeline.

Mr Whiskers remains beside the back door, occasionally meowing and looking toward the kitchen counter. Under ordinary circumstances I would assume he wants breakfast, but he has already eaten, and yesterday’s coffee-canister incident demonstrated that his behavior can sometimes reflect knowledge the rest of us do not possess. In that case, he remembered where Pandora had hidden a package of salmon treats and spent an entire day attempting to communicate their location. I am therefore reluctant to dismiss his current interest as meaningless. I crouch beside him and ask what he is looking at. He turns his head toward the door, meows, and then walks toward the counter where the gloves are sitting. I follow him. He sniffs the air, looks up at the gloves, and sits down. I examine them more carefully. There is a little dirt on the fingertips and what appears to be a small piece of dried grass caught near one of the seams. Nothing particularly unusual, but the cat has now independently directed my attention toward the same objects I was already investigating. I tell him that while I appreciate his cooperation, he needs to provide more specific information if he expects me to draw a conclusion.

Pandora eventually comes downstairs and finds me examining Mrs Jenkins’ gloves while Mr Whiskers watches from the floor. She takes one look at the scene and asks, “What are you doing?” I tell her I’m trying to determine why the gloves are here. She says Mrs Jenkins stopped by yesterday afternoon and must have forgotten them. I ask why Mrs Jenkins was wearing gardening gloves inside our kitchen. Pandora explains that she had been working outside and came over to ask whether we had a small screwdriver she could borrow. Apparently something on her garden hose attachment had come loose, and she thought John might have a tool that would fit. John found a screwdriver, Mrs Jenkins borrowed it, and everyone went about their business. I ask why nobody mentioned this to me. Pandora says, “Because you were at work, and it was a screwdriver.” I explain that the size of an object does not determine whether an event involving it is relevant. She looks at the French press, which is still sitting untouched on the counter, and asks whether I intend to drink my coffee before it gets cold. I tell her the coffee can wait. She says, “Of course it can,” in a tone suggesting she has already accepted that the morning is going to be longer than necessary.

This explanation should resolve the gloves, but it introduces another question. If Mrs Jenkins borrowed a screwdriver yesterday, why are her gloves still here this morning? I ask Pandora whether she returned the screwdriver. She says she doesn’t know because John handled it. I ask whether Mrs Jenkins came back after borrowing it. Pandora thinks for a moment and says she might have, but she was on the phone at the time and wasn’t paying attention. This is not an ideal level of witness reliability. I look toward the hallway where John disappeared, then at the gloves, then at Mr Whiskers, who has resumed staring toward the back door. I begin to suspect that the incident may not have concluded when everyone assumed it did. Pandora tells me that Mrs Jenkins probably just forgot the gloves. I agree that this is possible, but I also point out that people generally notice when they are no longer wearing gardening gloves. Pandora says, “Not when they take them off.” I consider this response. Technically, she has identified a weakness in my reasoning, although I don’t think she needed to look quite so pleased about it.

At work, I decide to obtain an independent opinion from Karen and Dave. I explain that a neighbor borrowed a screwdriver, left her gardening gloves in our kitchen, and apparently never returned to collect them. Karen asks whether the neighbor has forgotten them. I tell her that is the prevailing theory, but I’m concerned about several inconsistencies. Dave asks what the inconsistencies are. I explain that John has been staying up late, Mr Whiskers has been meowing near the back door, and Pandora was distracted when Mrs Jenkins borrowed the tool. Dave listens carefully before asking whether I believe the screwdriver is connected to John being tired. I tell him I haven’t ruled it out. Karen asks whether I have considered asking Mrs Jenkins why she left the gloves. I explain that doing so before reconstructing the events could influence her recollection. Dave says, “Or she could tell you she forgot them.” Karen laughs, and I realize I have once again selected two people who are unwilling to approach an otherwise straightforward investigation with the seriousness it deserves.

When I return home that afternoon, I find John sitting at the kitchen table with his laptop open and a cup of coffee beside him. He looks considerably more awake than he did this morning, which I attribute to either improved rest or caffeine. I ask whether he returned Mrs Jenkins’ screwdriver. He says no, because she still has it. I ask why she still has it. He says she hasn’t brought it back. I ask whether he knows what she was fixing. He says something on her hose. I ask whether he helped her. He says no. Then he looks at me and asks why I am so interested in the screwdriver. I explain that the gloves remain unaccounted for in the sequence of events. John says, “They’re on the counter.” I tell him that is precisely the problem. He looks toward the counter, where the gloves are still sitting, and says, “Then give them back to her.” I remind him that Mrs Jenkins is currently in possession of one of our screwdrivers, which means the exchange is not quite as simple as returning a forgotten personal item. John closes his laptop and says, “You are making a screwdriver sound like an international incident.”

A few minutes later, Mrs Jenkins knocks on the door. I open it and find her holding the screwdriver in one hand and a small plastic bag in the other. She smiles and says she came to return the tool and collect her gloves. I invite her into the kitchen, where she immediately spots them on the counter. She explains that she removed them yesterday because they were muddy and she didn’t want to get dirt on anything while borrowing the screwdriver. Then she became distracted talking to Pandora and forgot to pick them up before leaving. This accounts for their presence in the kitchen, but I still want to know why she needed the screwdriver in the first place. Mrs Jenkins explains that the hose attachment outside had been leaking, and she was trying to tighten a small fitting. The screwdriver helped her remove a cover, but the fitting itself needed a replacement washer, which she picked up at the hardware store this morning. I ask whether the repair was successful. She says it was, although she got rather wet testing it. Then she holds up the plastic bag. Inside is the old washer, which she apparently brought along because she thought John might be interested in seeing why it failed. John looks at the bag and says, “I’m good, thanks.”

This should be the end of the matter, except Mr Whiskers suddenly becomes extremely interested in Mrs Jenkins’ shoes. He walks over, sniffs them, and begins meowing with the same urgency he displayed this morning. Mrs Jenkins laughs and tells him he is being a very curious boy. I ask whether she has been carrying salmon treats. She says no. I ask whether she gave him any yesterday. Again, no. Then she remembers that while she was working outside, she had seen a small bird hopping around near the garden hose and had stopped to watch it. Mr Whiskers had been sitting at the window staring at the bird for several minutes. She says he became particularly animated when the bird hopped close to the door. I look at Mr Whiskers, who is now sitting beside the same door and watching Mrs Jenkins as though he expects her to produce something. It occurs to me that he may have associated her presence, her gardening gloves, and the back door with the possibility of another bird appearing outside. Pandora says, “Or he just likes Mrs Jenkins.” I tell her the two explanations are not mutually exclusive.

Mrs Jenkins retrieves her gloves, thanks us for lending her the screwdriver, and heads back across the hall. Mr Whiskers follows her as far as the doorway before sitting down and watching her leave. I close the door and return to the kitchen, where Pandora is finally pouring herself a fresh cup of coffee. She asks whether I am satisfied now. I tell her that the gardening gloves have been accounted for, the screwdriver has been returned, Mrs Jenkins’ hose has been repaired, and the cat’s behavior appears consistent with his interest in the bird he saw yesterday. John says, “So nothing happened.” I explain that several things happened, but none of them appear to have been connected in the way I initially suspected. John says that sounds suspiciously like another way of saying nothing happened. I tell him the distinction matters. He asks whether I have considered that perhaps I should spend less time investigating household objects and more time drinking my coffee. I look at the French press, which has been sitting on the counter since this morning. I had forgotten about it entirely.

I pour myself a cup and take a sip. It is cold, bitter, and considerably less satisfying than it would have been several hours earlier. Pandora watches me make a face and says, “You could have made another pot.” I explain that doing so would have interrupted the investigation. She points out that the investigation is over. I tell her that is precisely why I am finally drinking the coffee. John laughs and returns to his room, where I hear him resume whatever work has been keeping him awake at night. Mr Whiskers settles beside the back door, apparently satisfied that the morning’s excitement has concluded. I stand in the kitchen considering the events of the day. Mrs Jenkins forgot her gloves because she borrowed a screwdriver. John was tired because he had been working late. Pandora was distracted because she had been on the phone. Mr Whiskers was interested in the garden because he had seen a bird. Every suspicious detail has a perfectly ordinary explanation, and I have spent most of the day trying to connect things that were never connected in the first place.

Then I hear a scratching sound from the back door.

Mr Whiskers immediately sits upright, ears forward, tail twitching. I look toward the door and see a small shadow move across the glass. A bird lands on the outside ledge, pecks at something, and flies away. Mr Whiskers follows it with his eyes, then looks directly at me as though he expects an acknowledgment of his observational abilities. I tell him I saw it. He meows once and returns to watching the window. Pandora comes into the kitchen and asks what happened. I tell her the cat was right about the bird. She looks outside, sees nothing, and says, “Of course he was. He’s a cat.” I explain that his interest in Mrs Jenkins’ gardening gloves may have been a response to a specific environmental association rather than random curiosity. Pandora takes a sip of coffee and says, “Hal, the cat saw a bird.” I tell her that is an unnecessarily simplistic interpretation of the evidence. She smiles and walks away.

I look down at Mr Whiskers, who is still watching the door. I have to admit that his ability to detect small changes in his environment continues to impress me. Yesterday he remembered where his treats were hidden. Today he recognized a location associated with a bird he wanted to watch. These are not extraordinary accomplishments for a cat, but they do suggest a level of situational awareness that deserves recognition. I tell him that while I appreciate his contributions, I would prefer if he could provide more specific information before I abandon my coffee to investigate another household mystery. He looks up at me, blinks slowly, and then turns back toward the window. I take another sip of my cold coffee and consider the possibility that he understands exactly what I’m saying. Then I remember that he has successfully convinced three adults to retrieve hidden treats, investigate kitchen appliances, and spend an entire morning discussing gardening gloves. I’m beginning to think the problem isn’t that Mr Whiskers knows something I don’t. The problem is that he knows exactly how to get me to do the investigating for him.

Related Posts

• I’m Starting to Suspect the Neighborhood
• The Cat’s Behavior Is More Suspicious Than I Thought
• I’m Starting to Suspect Mr Whiskers Knows More

I’m making my morning coffee when I notice that the lid on the coffee canister isn’t completely closed. It’s sitting slightly crooked, leaving a narrow gap along one side, which is unusual because I distinctly remember closing it yesterday. I remember this because I had to move the canister to clean up a few coffee grounds, and I made a point of putting everything back where it belonged. Pandora is getting ready for work, John Mercer is still in his room, and Mr Whiskers is lying on the kitchen floor watching me with an expression I have recently begun to take more seriously. Under ordinary circumstances, I would assume someone simply forgot to close the lid. Unfortunately, yesterday Mr Whiskers successfully alerted us to a piece of burnt bread trapped inside the toaster, which means I can no longer dismiss his behavior as meaningless without considering the possibility that I am ignoring a demonstrated detection capability. I look at the canister, then at the cat. He looks back at me without blinking. I’m not suggesting he opened it himself. I’m simply uncomfortable with how interested he seems in my reaction.

Pandora comes into the kitchen looking for her travel mug and finds me examining the coffee canister. She asks what I’m doing, and I explain that the lid has been disturbed. She looks at it for approximately half a second before saying, “Someone probably made coffee.” I tell her that explanation accounts for the lid being opened but not necessarily for it being left crooked. She reminds me that three adults live in this house and all three are capable of making coffee without submitting a report afterward. I ask whether she used the canister last night. She says no. I ask whether she noticed John making coffee. She says she didn’t. I ask whether she remembers the lid being closed yesterday afternoon. Pandora puts down her travel mug and looks at me. “Hal, are we investigating another kitchen container?” I explain that this is entirely different from the sugar incident because the coffee canister contains a substance that people deliberately seek out, sometimes at unusual hours. She tells me that description also applies to the refrigerator, the pantry, and most of the kitchen.

John eventually comes into the room, and I ask whether he made coffee during the night. He says no, although he admits he came downstairs for a glass of water sometime after midnight. I ask whether he noticed anything unusual. He thinks for a moment and says Mr Whiskers was sitting on the counter when he came in. This gets my attention because the cat has recently developed an unfortunate interest in objects that ordinarily have no business involving him. I ask what Mr Whiskers was doing. John says, “Being a cat.” I explain that I need a more precise description. John says the cat was sitting beside the coffee maker looking toward the window. I ask whether the canister was open. He doesn’t remember. I ask whether he heard anything. He says the refrigerator was humming. I ask whether he saw anyone else. He says no. Then he looks at Pandora and asks whether I have started doing this every morning. Pandora tells him it has become something of a routine. I object to that characterization because the toaster incident was a legitimate safety concern, and the sugar investigation established an accurate timeline. John says, “You spent half an hour questioning a spoon.” I tell him the spoon was evidence, not a witness.

I try to put the matter aside, but Mr Whiskers makes that difficult. Every time I return to the kitchen, he is sitting somewhere near the coffee canister. Sometimes he looks at the cupboard. Sometimes he looks at the window. Once he stretches up on his hind legs and sniffs the counter before sitting down again. I begin to suspect he is attempting to direct my attention toward something, although the precise subject remains unclear. When I move the canister to another part of the counter, he follows it with his eyes. When I put it back, he watches that too. I repeat this twice to determine whether the response is consistent. Pandora catches me moving the canister back and forth and asks whether I am conducting an experiment. I tell her I am testing a hypothesis. She asks what the hypothesis is. I admit I haven’t narrowed it down sufficiently to explain. She says, “Then you’re just moving the coffee around.” I don’t appreciate how often she can describe my methodology in ways that make it sound ridiculous.

At work, I mention the situation to Karen because she was surprisingly supportive of Mr Whiskers’ abilities during the toaster incident. I explain that the coffee canister was open, John saw the cat near the coffee maker during the night, and Mr Whiskers has been showing unusual interest in the area ever since. Karen asks whether the cat might have knocked the lid loose. I tell her the canister is too heavy for that to be the most likely explanation. Dave overhears the conversation and asks whether anyone else used the coffee. I explain that nobody has admitted to it. He asks whether I have considered the possibility that I left the lid open myself. I tell him I distinctly remember closing it. Dave reminds me that last week I spent an entire evening investigating a messy room before discovering I had created most of the mess. I acknowledge that recent history has introduced certain questions about the reliability of my recollection, but I don’t think it justifies dismissing every new observation. Karen asks what Mr Whiskers actually did. I explain that he stared at the canister. She waits for me to continue. When I don’t, she says, “Hal, sometimes cats stare at things.” I tell her that is precisely the problem. They stare at so many things that identifying the significant observations becomes extremely difficult.

When I get home that afternoon, Mrs Jenkins is standing outside her door holding a small container. She smiles and asks whether Pandora is home because she wants to return something she borrowed yesterday. I tell her Pandora isn’t back yet and offer to take it. Mrs Jenkins hands me the container and mentions that Mr Whiskers was particularly affectionate during her visit the previous afternoon. Apparently he followed her into the kitchen, rubbed against her legs, and spent several minutes watching her while she talked to Pandora. This interests me because Mrs Jenkins has previously established a reliable method of obtaining Mr Whiskers’ attention through salmon treats. I ask whether she gave him anything yesterday. She says no, although she did bring over some homemade cookies for Pandora and John. I ask whether the cookies contained coffee. Mrs Jenkins looks confused and says they were oatmeal raisin. I thank her and return inside, where I find Mr Whiskers sitting beside the kitchen counter. He looks at the container in my hand, then at the cupboard. I tell him I know he knows something. He yawns, which is not the response I was hoping for.

Pandora arrives home about twenty minutes later, and I explain that Mrs Jenkins confirmed Mr Whiskers had been unusually interested in the kitchen yesterday. Pandora asks what I mean by unusually interested. I explain that he followed Mrs Jenkins around and watched her while she talked. Pandora says, “She had cookies.” I point out that Mr Whiskers doesn’t ordinarily eat oatmeal raisin cookies. She reminds me that he doesn’t know what is inside a cookie until he investigates it. This is a reasonable argument, but it still doesn’t explain the coffee canister. Then Pandora remembers something. Yesterday afternoon, while Mrs Jenkins was visiting, Pandora opened the canister to show her the coffee we had been using because Mrs Jenkins had asked why the kitchen smelled so good. She had apparently been thinking about trying a different brand and wanted to know whether ours was worth buying. Pandora opened the lid, let her smell it, and then became distracted when Mr Whiskers jumped onto the counter. She moved him down, finished talking to Mrs Jenkins, and forgot to close the lid properly.

I stand there considering this explanation. It accounts for the crooked lid, Mrs Jenkins’ visit, and the fact that Pandora didn’t remember using the coffee. Technically, she hadn’t used it. She had simply opened the container for someone else. I point out that the distinction matters because my original question concerned whether she had made coffee, not whether she had opened the canister. Pandora says, “You asked whether I used it last night. This happened yesterday afternoon.” I tell her that establishes why her answer was technically accurate but operationally incomplete. She looks at me for a long moment before asking whether I am seriously criticizing her for failing to provide a complete history of the coffee container. I assure her I am not criticizing anyone. I’m simply reconstructing the sequence of events. Pandora says the sequence is that she opened the coffee, showed it to Mrs Jenkins, put the cat on the floor, and forgot the lid. She then closes the canister in front of me and asks whether the case can be considered resolved.

It probably could have been, except Mr Whiskers is still sitting beside the cupboard. He has barely moved during the entire conversation, and when Pandora puts the canister away, he follows it with his eyes. I explain that while the lid has been accounted for, the cat’s continued interest remains unexplained. Pandora tells me he probably smells the coffee. I remind her that he has lived in a house containing coffee for years without showing this level of interest. John comes into the kitchen, listens to the discussion, and says, “Maybe he likes the smell.” I point out that this would represent a previously undocumented preference. John looks at Pandora and asks whether she thinks I am ever going to stop analyzing the cat. Pandora says she stopped expecting that months ago. Mr Whiskers gets up, walks to the cupboard, and scratches lightly at the door. I look at John. John looks at Pandora. Pandora looks at the cupboard. For the first time, all three of us appear to agree that the cat wants something specific.

I open the cupboard. Mr Whiskers immediately stands on his hind legs and tries to look inside. The coffee canister is on the lower shelf beside a box of tea, some filters, and a small paper bag that I don’t remember seeing before. I pick up the bag. Inside is a package of salmon-flavored cat treats. I turn toward Pandora. She smiles in the way people smile when they have just realized something obvious that another person has spent an unreasonable amount of time trying to establish. Apparently Mrs Jenkins had brought the treats over yesterday along with the cookies, but Pandora had put them in the cupboard while they were talking because she didn’t want Mr Whiskers demanding them immediately. Then she forgot about them. The cat, however, had not forgotten. He had watched her put the bag away and had been waiting for someone to retrieve it ever since. His interest in the coffee canister was entirely incidental. The canister happened to be sitting in front of the treats.

John starts laughing. Pandora leans against the counter and asks whether this satisfies my concerns about the cat’s behavior. I tell her it certainly explains why he was watching the cupboard, although it raises a separate question about his ability to remember the location of food for more than twenty-four hours. John says, “Hal, the cat knew where his treats were.” I explain that this is precisely the point. He retained the information, recognized the storage location, and attempted to communicate his objective to multiple members of the household. Pandora says, “He wanted a snack.” I tell her the two interpretations are not mutually exclusive. She opens the package and gives Mr Whiskers one treat. He eats it immediately, then sits down and looks up at her again. John says, “Looks like he wants another.” I tell him not to encourage the behavior. Mr Whiskers looks at me, then at the bag, then back at Pandora. She gives him a second treat.

Later that evening, I’m sitting on the couch thinking about the events of the day while Mr Whiskers sleeps beside me. The coffee canister has been accounted for, Mrs Jenkins has been cleared of any suspicious activity, and Pandora has confirmed that no secret coffee-related incident occurred during the night. More importantly, Mr Whiskers demonstrated that he can remember where something desirable has been hidden and persistently direct human attention toward it. I tell Pandora this represents a meaningful development in our understanding of his behavior. She says, “It means he remembers where we keep the treats.” I tell her she is reducing a potentially significant cognitive achievement to a grocery-storage issue. John calls from the kitchen that he thinks Mr Whiskers deserves another treat for being smarter than all of us. I tell him the cat has already received sufficient compensation for his participation.

A few minutes later, Mr Whiskers wakes up, stretches, and jumps down from the couch. He walks toward the kitchen, stops beside the cupboard, and looks back at me. I tell him the treats are finished for the evening. He meows once, waits, and then walks toward the front door instead. I watch him sit down on the mat and stare at the handle. A moment later there is a knock. When I open the door, Mrs Jenkins is standing there holding a fresh bag of salmon treats. She says she was at the store and thought Mr Whiskers might like another package. The cat immediately sits at her feet and looks up with an expression of complete innocence. I look at Mrs Jenkins, then at the cat, then back toward the kitchen where Pandora and John are already laughing. I’m willing to accept that Mr Whiskers knew where the treats were hidden. What I’m having considerably more trouble accepting is that he also seems to know when the next shipment is arriving.

Related Posts

• Mr Whiskers Knew Something I Didn’t Yesterday Morning
• I Think Mr Whiskers Is Trying to Warn Me
• I Think Dave’s Secretly Using Our Coffee